Відео

🙏👍

I really don't understand why the guest brought up Isaiah 44:20 to affirm trinity (a term and attendant concept I personally do not like). But what an odd verse to appeal to! What a head scratcher. I would have thought he'd have pointed to something like Isaiah 48:16 Come ye near unto me, hear ye this; I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, there am I: and now the Lord GOD, and his Spirit, hath sent me.

una cosa es ser hebreo y otra es saber hebreo. o saber hebreo no quiere drcir que lo sea y hacipasa con el judaísmo profesar judaismo no quiere decir que lo sea y haci pasa en israel profesan judaismo por conversion no por genetica

12:12 where do I start? "So he said start in the gospel of John" Oy vey! I **so wish** that this wasn't the standard suggestion to seekers.

Gods plan I didn’t go Trek 🎉😂

Hope to see something like this in regards to The Taíno people of Puerto Rico and the Caribbean. We DO BELIEVE it’s one of the lost tribes, because a rock was found with what looks like ancient Hebrew letter’s that an old Taino woman was hiding from the Spaniard Invader’s.

This geologist Scott I found hard to listen. He is arrogant, biased, and intolerant of any questioning of his conclusion study. Totally defensive and ready to pounce and dismiss. This is why he is discredited and not a reliable source of information. Conjecture is not proof! This guy assumes way to much and uses flag words to support his flawed theories. Parsimonious Archeaology. The guy is a joke and not a real scientist by standards we apply to get to credible discovery. Seems like a real ass hat which noone wants to work with or for!

Check out D&C 111

More!

(Thus he declared all foods ritualer clean)Complete Jewish Bible.....CJB MY Christian friends say that Yeshua made all foods clean. But I say that we have to think that he is a jew and he did follow Torah. All food is what is food in ewery culture. Some are eating dogs and bats. If I meet a headhunter deep in the djungle, will he think of me as clean food after hearing Mark 7:19? So what does Mark 7:19 really say?

How about we work on NOT being descended from any HEBREW.

Day יְוֹם is Yawm, not Yvm. It is also used as a Waw in countless other places such as (Elohim) Alawheem אלוהים it’s not Alvheem. The living grammar is consistent with Waw and Vav may be a dialectical Hebrew influenced from Europe. Syria is bordered to Europe and Jerusalem is a bridge between Europe and the Middle East. Multiple European nations have ruled there and influenced the customs and culture of the region and European Jewry have been the most dominant of an influence over Judaism by far and large, Sephardi and Ashkenazi, not Mizrahi, yet the Israelites originally come from the Mizrach, not from the Sephard or Ashkenaz; not saying the latter are not Israelites, but the European influence of those communities is also clearly and considerably apparent, all due respect. Being among Mizrahi communities who also spoke Arabic would give the safe space for the Hebrew to preserve its purely Semitic origins and essence. Especially in places like Yemen where no European nation has ever colonized. For instance the ‘Ayn ע was even mispronounced by Galileans as you stated to the point to where they would not be allowed to lead the prayers among communities that pronounced the ‘Ayn ע properly. And the common denominator between those who mispronounce the ‘Ayn ע till this day as an Alef א is that they also pronounce Waw ו as Vav even though Waw is consistent with the grammatical vowel usage. Benawt, Yawm, Alawheem, Yaladawt, etc.

Why modern academia always wants to distort history? Why corrupt?

I do not use the term God. Day one, the creator is creation itself. Everything you see in the visible light spectrum and not be able to view in the other wave lengths is energy. This includes us and all matter which is energy. There seems to be confusion between creation and evolution. Evolution was incorporated with creation as energy that changes form but is still the same. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it just changes form. Day one cannot be a day in human terms as you are ready to believe. The sun, moon, and stars were not created until day four. This includes the illusion of time. Day five animals came into existence and evolved before humans on day six in the likeness of the creator. We are energy. Day seven is when the illusion of time starts. The creator does not rest. A silly notion. So, in essence, creation itself is energy and that energy is the creator.

Nehemia, you are a very patient man.

Nehemia, I listened to your explanation very carefully, and all these examples do not change the fact that Halleluyah tells us that it is not YEH, and you are the one pulling the fast one. Your double talk may fool a lot of people, shame on you.

Can you say Kensington Rune Stones.

Click bate

Is the stones composition indigenous to the area it was found?

At 19:05 not a spirit in the air but perhaps a Jewish sect or form of ritual that no longer exists? The common ancestor of two languages isn't either of the two existing languages.

_@Nehemia Gordon_ -- Thank you for tackling this subject. The evidence for ancient Hebrew visitors to America is growing. If I remember correctly, the most compelling evidence is genetic. Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson has been studying the DNA of native Americans for several years and I recall him discovering a unique Hebrew strain in some tribes. Jeanson's work is forcing historians to reconsider many of their theories about migration of early peoples into and across America. His book "Traced, Human DNA's Big Surprise" is excellent. Thank you for the polite way you questioned Scott Wolter. It was disappointing to see his confusion and lack of comprehension -- he didn't seem to understand several of your questions. Nor did he appear to understand their relevance to his credibility. Volunteering that he is a Mason and a Templar is not the way to establish scientific credibility and I'm glad that you teased from him that this came _after_ his Bat Creek Stone research. His comments often strayed too wide of the subject. Plus, he seems to think that authoring books is somehow equivalent to evidence. It is not. I have read many authors who lacked critical reason and who fabricated or miss-applied evidence (it has taught me to check footnotes and sources). So, claiming you have written much on a subject is no guarantee that you are correct -- or even as knowledgeable as you think you are. Wolter's books may be excellent -- I have not read them. But to cite them as evidence in this video is foolish. In a video like this, he needs to succinctly cite only specific evidence and not rely on "I wrote a book". His comments at the end about "the Name" were bizarre and it was a shame that he appeared unaware of your extensive work on that subject. Lastly, I am disappointed that a translation of the Paleo Hebrew text on the Bat Creek Stone was not offered in this video. If you do a "Part 2" video as you indicated, please include a translation in it.

Something that came to my mind during the discussion of the polish was did anyone consider the polish could have been caused by carrying a valuable possession in ones pocket?

A fascinating study about Hebrew writing in early America! Weigh the evidence for yourselves. I lean towards it being real but I don’t know if it can be proven 100 percent either way. Sort of like the Shroud of Turin. Doesn’t effect my faith either way. Thank you Nehemiah!

* The Messiah Isaiah 53:1-12 - "Who has put faith in the thing heard from us? And as for the arm of Jehovah, to whom has it been revealed? 2 He will come up like a twig before him, like a root out of parched land. No stately form does he have, nor any splendor; And when we see him, his appearance does not draw us to him. 3 He was despised and was avoided by men, A man who was meant for pains and was familiar with sickness. It was as if his face were hidden from us. He was despised, and we held him as of no account. 4 Truly he himself carried our sicknesses, And he bore our pains. But we considered him as plagued, stricken by God and afflicted. 5 But he was pierced for our transgression; He was crushed for our errors. He bore the punishment for our peace, And because of his wounds we were healed. 6 Like sheep we have all wandered about, Each has turned his own way, And Jehovah has caused the error of us all to meet up with him. 7 He was oppressed and he let himself be afflicted, But he would not open his mouth. He was brought like a sheep to the slaughter, Like a ewe that is silent before its shearers, And he would not open his mouth. 8 Because of restraint and judgment he was taken away; And who will concern himself with the details of his generation? For he was cut off from the land of the living; Because of the transgression of my people he received the stroke. 9 And he was given a burial place with the wicked, And with the rich in his death, Although he had done no wrong And there was no deception in his mouth. 10 But it was Jehovah’s will to crush him, and he let him become sick. If you will present his life as a guilt offering, He will see his offspring, he will prolong his days, And through him the delight of Jehovah will have success. 11 Because of his anguish, he will see and be satisfied. By means of his knowledge the righteous one, my servant, Will bring a righteous standing to many people, And their errors he will bear. 12 For that reason I will assign him a portion among the many, And he will apportion the spoil with the mighty, Because he poured out his life even to death And was counted among the transgressors; He carried the sin of many people, And he interceded for the transgressors." * For the transgressors will have their own due. Luke 12:8 - “I say to you, everyone who acknowledges me before men, the Son of man will also acknowledge him before the angels of God." 1 John 2:23 - "Everyone who denies the Son does not have the Father either. But whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also." * For what is meant to happen will happen. Revelation 16:12 - "The sixth one poured out his bowl on the great river Eu·phraʹtes, and its water was dried up to prepare the way for the kings from the rising of the sun." Daniel 11:44 - “But reports out of the east and out of the north will disturb him, and he will go out in a great rage to annihilate and to devote many to destruction."

I used to belong to the 430 years hardcore camp, but when I took time to watch some videos of "my enemies" I noticed that they have some real valid arguments. I spent weeks to reexamine the issue and pray about it. to make the story short, I dropped the towel. Right now, I'm convinced that the Israelites didn't spend 430 years in Egypt. The 215 years period makes a lot more sense. Now, you may thing but why the text sounds controversial and confusing? There is a REASON. The author (GOD) wants us to really dive in the scriptures and study it. I discovered another puzzle and it is connected to this one. Why the author started the counting of Adam's age in Genesis 5 (with Seth), not in Genesis 4 (with Cain and Abel)?

Nehemia.. I am a big fan of yours but you need to know Dan Fogel is a scam artist. He is like an anti Semite telling everyone about Jews.

if you read the Book of Mormon the women the men marry at the start as they travel down through the Hejaz to Naham and then down to the southern coast of Yemen the marry Ishmaelite women so tactically if you take the book of Mormon as a real history the native Americans would be descendance of the Arabs

That was so fascinating! Can't wait for the next one. Maybe you guys can collaborate on the name lol. Thanks!

Oh. Man. If he just hadn't started explaining about God's name to the worlds unequivocally foremost authority on God's name😂😂😂 Actually, I his investigative work into the paleo Hebrew stone immensely and found it pretty convincing based on the new scratches vs. the original letters. I think it would have been nearly impossible for the guy who discovered it to scratch the paleo on it and then weather those scatches to make it look old with the technology they had in the late 19th century. Furthermore, why would he write paleo Hebrew on it snd say it was paleo Cherokee if he was trying to fake something😂😂 So, please ignore his exuberance about Freemasonism and lack of knowledge about God's name and get him back. Like yo hear about the Tucson lead stuff and others. We can take his speculations with a grain of salt. But, i do like his proofs so far.

Most scholars consider the Bat Creek Stone to be a hoax. The Bat Creek Stone was discovered in 1889 in a burial mound in Tennessee and was initially claimed to be evidence of pre-Columbian contact between Native Americans and people from the Old World. However, linguistic and archaeological analysis has shown that the inscriptions on the stone are more consistent with modern forgeries. Specifically, the inscriptions appear to be a poor imitation of Paleo-Hebrew characters.

I am Mormon and I love Nehemia's works. Thank you sir.

It is easy for ancient sailors to come from the old world to the Americas . To claim that they did not is just silly.

The Smithsonian launching virulent attacks on anything that flies in the face of their assumptions is nothing new. Linguist Joseph Greenberg's "Language in the Americas" (1987) which applied exactly the same method which led to the discovery of the Indo-European language family to Native American languages was attacked especially strongly by the Smithsonian. Thing is, linguists who've spent their whole careers studying a single language often take pride in the belief that their language is a "language isolate" which belief can rise if you don't do much looking around at other languages. So when comparative studies are done showing that your pet language is merely one branch of a vast tree it's a professional insult which must be "shouted down". However not only are the similarities within the various language-families Greenberg proposed quite obvious, these groupings have been supported by modern DNA studies.

Did I miss something or was the name Dr Barry Fell (Harvard) not mentioned? His book "America BC: Ancient Settlers in the New World" (1976) received a scathing and detailed attack from the Smithsonian (1978).

Was the book of genesis written in paleo Hebrew?

Ok Nehemia, did I miss it? All of that was great, but what does the inscription say (or not say)?

So what was Nehemia's conclusion?